|
Resources
Main Menu
|
 |
 |
|
|
This Week's Question
July
26, 2004
By Nena Groskind |
 |

| Q: I’m
having trouble understanding the capital gains tax implications of two
home sale transactions I am contemplating. A 30-minute session with
IRS representatives did nothing to clarify my understanding of the
issue. Perhaps you can help. I am 65 years old, currently living in my
primary residence, which I purchased 30 years ago for $25,000. I plan
to sell the house in 1999, and expect to price it at about $250,000. I
also own a vacation property on Cape Cod, which I purchased for
$11,000, and which currently is valued at about $100,000. I’m hoping
to sell this property next year, and purchase a home that costs at
least $100,000 and probably more than that. My questions are: 1) When
I sell my primary residence in two years, what (if anything) will I
have to pay in capital gains? 2) How much (if any) of a capital gains
tax will I face on the sale of my Cape Cod home? 3) Will there be any
penalty imposed if I sell both houses within a one-year period?
|
A: Let’s take
these transactions one at a time, and then put them back together and
see if we can’t come up with a somewhat more advantageous strategy for
you. Let’s start with your primary residence. You can exclude up to
$500,000 of the gain ($250,000 if you file singly rather than jointly)
from the sale, and there is no requirement (as there was under the old
law) that you purchase a replacement residence worth as much or more
than the one you’re selling. If your numbers are accurate, even using
the single-taxpayer rule, you will be able to exclude all of the gain
you realize on this sale.
Your Cape Cod residence is not your primary residence, and so it does
not qualify for the capital gains exclusion. When you sell this
property, you will be liable for the entire gain, adjusted for capital
improvements, selling expenses, etc.
As for your third question, there’s no penalty, per se for selling
both houses within a one-year period, except for the self-imposed tax
penalty that results from structuring these transactions as you are
proposing. If taxes are a major concern, why not consider selling your
primary residence first, since that will qualify right away for the
gain exclusion, and you’re under no compulsion to buy a replacement
residence immediately – or ever. You’re also allowed to claim the
exclusion as often as every two years. So, you could occupy the Cape
residence as your primary home, live there for at least two years
(thereby satisfying the requirement that you occupy a home for at
least two of the five years preceding the sale) and then claim the
exclusion and eliminate your tax liability on this sale, too. There
may be compelling reasons, which you didn’t mention, for the timetable
you described. But the new tax law provides a much less costly avenue,
which you should consider.
These transactions probably have long-term financial-planning as well
as short-term tax implications for you. So you should consult an
accountant, an estate lawyer, or a financial planner, to make sure you
consider all the relevant issues before you proceed.
|
|