|
Resources
Main Menu
|
 |
 |
|
|
This Week's Question
August 22, 2005
By Nena Groskind |
 |

|
Q: Several months
ago, our condominium association decided to remove our underground oil
tank as a preventative measure. We discovered during the removal
process that the tank had been leaking for some time, possibly as much
as a year or more, so the clean-up costs ultimately totaled about
$25,000. That work now has been completed and certified as acceptable
by all the appropriate regulatory bodies, but I have several questions
about the implications for our association:
- Has the removal of the underground
tank increased the value of our units?
- Will the removal, and the fact that
the tank linked prior to removal, have any possible repercussions
for future owners? Are we required to inform prospective buyers of
the removal and the spill?
- Finally, should we notify the
insurance company that provides the blanket coverage for our
association that we no longer have an underground tank and that our
new tank is aboveground, in the basement?

A: The removal of the leaking
underground tank has not increased the value of your units, unless you
consider a jump from zero (their approximate value before you took
care of the problem) to something close to market value today an
increase. The previous existence of a tank that is no longer in place
on the site of a spill that has been cleaned and passed muster with
state environmental authorities, should not have any implications for
future owners.
As individual owners, you have no legal obligation to disclose this
information and I don’t see any moral imperative to disclose a problem
that not longer exists. If a buyer asks specifically if there’s ever
been an underground tank or an oil spill, you should respond honestly,
and then present the documents indicating that the site has been given
a clean bill of health.
Notifying your insurance company (which may or may not have been aware
that the underground tank existed in the first place) probably isn’t a
bad idea. The removal of the tank is unlikely to affect your premium,
and, as I’m sure you’re aware, your policy won’t cover the tank
removal or site clean-up costs. But the pollution exclusion clause
that is standard in most insurance policies does not apply to damages
suffered by third parties. So if it turns out that oil from your
leaking tank polluted an adjacent property, your policy should cover
those liability costs. There’s no requirement that you notify your
insurer of the successful tank removal and clean up, but there is also
no particular reason not to do so. |
|