|
Resources
Main Menu
|
 |
 |
|
|
This Week's Question
September 19, 2005
By Nena Groskind |
 |

|
Q: Shortly after my
divorce, in November of 1998, I purchased a small condominium for my
two young children and myself. At the time, I did not anticipate ever
being married again, but there are some things you can’t predict. I
have met someone else and we’re going to be married in July of this
year. My new spouse and I plan to sell the homes we currently own and
purchase a larger dwelling that can accommodate our combined families.
That won’t be a problem for my prospective husband, because he’s owned
his home since 1987 and so will be eligible to exclude the gain when
he sells. But because I have not owned and occupied my condominium for
two years, I’m told, I won’t be eligible for the exclusion and so will
have to pay taxes on any gain I realize on the sale. I thought there
was a provision for “unforeseen circumstances” in the IRS code, but
those regulations haven’t been written yet and no one with whom I’ve
spoken at the IRS seems to know when those guidelines will be issued.
Can you suggest any other solution to this potentially costly dilemma?

A: Yes, and it
doesn’t require hoping for a favorable ruling on a murky tax question.
Based on the timetable you outlined, you have to hold on to your
existing house until November of this year to meet the two-year
ownership and occupancy requirement for excluding the gain on the sale
of your primary residence. So, why not just delay your sale until
then? You don’t have to postpone the wedding – only the sale of your
existing home.
This strategy has some obvious disadvantages. Interest rates (and home
prices) may rise in the interim, increasing your purchase costs; and
in a tight market, you may lose out on some homebuying opportunities
while you’re running out the tax clock. You’ll have to weigh the risks
you incur by waiting against the costs you’ll incur by selling
prematurely.
Delaying the sale also will require you to continue living in your now
too-small unit for longer than you’d like, but we’re only talking
about a few extra months. And I suspect the temporary overcrowding
will be less painful than the tax bill you’ll face if you can’t
exclude the gain on the sale of your existing home. |
|