|
Resources
Main Menu
|
 |
 |
|
|
This Week's Question
October 10, 2005
By Nena Groskind |
 |

|
Q: I have owned and
occupied my three bedroom condominium for the past seven years. About
two years ago, my bedroom ceiling began to leak, occasionally, when we
experienced a heavy rainfall. I reported the problem to the management
office at the time, but they did not take any action. Because the leak
was slight and occurred only intermittently, I didn’t press the
problem. But recently, the problem has gotten considerably worse. When
I asked again for some action to resolve the problem, I was told that
because I am the only one affected by the leak (my unit is on the top
floor), the association isn’t required to do anything about it.
Basically, the management company told me, it’s my problem; if I want
to fix it, I can pay for the repair. This seems unreasonable to me.

A: Not only
unreasonable, but also contrary to the association’s legal obligation
to maintain the common areas. The roof clearly qualifies as a common
area and, regardless of whether the leak is affecting one unit or 100
units, the association is responsible for financing any necessary
repair. The state condominium law and the condominium documents
require the association to use “reasonable care” in maintaining the
common areas, attorneys specializing in this area explain. If the
association fails to meet that obligation, it could be liable for any
damage that results.
That doesn’t mean the association is liable automatically for any
damages you or other unit owners might suffer, however. For example,
if a slow leak that you had never noticed previously caused your
bedroom ceiling to collapse, you could not necessarily claim that the
association had failed to exercise reasonable care. On the other hand,
if you complained about the leak for a year before the collapse, and
the association refused to take any action, my attorneys suggest, then
you’d have a strong argument that the association’s insurance company,
not yours, should pay for the damage.
Obviously, it would be much better for you and for the association to
address the problem before you’re arguing about who should pay for
damages. If the management company hasn’t responded, take your
complaint to the condominium board. If your personal request doesn’t
get anywhere, have an attorney write a letter on your behalf. Your
next step after that is to bring what is known as a “derivative
action,” asking a court to order the trustees to do what the law and
the condominium documents require—namely, repair the roof. You would
bring that action on behalf of all affected unit owners, and if the
court accepts the suit, it might order the association to pay court
costs and your attorneys’ fees.
If other owners don’t want to get involved (a not uncommon response),
you might point out that while water may not be dripping directly on
their heads, roof problems tend to get worse, not better, over time.
Deferring needed repairs will only increase the size of the bill that
unit owners will have to pay eventually to address the problem. If the
leak damages your apartment, the condo insurance policy will cover the
damage. But those policies typically have huge deductibles, which unit
owners must pay – another point you might make to owners who say your
leaky roof isn’t their problem. |
|