Condominium Insider

MEEB’s Condo Law Newsletter

HOW TO DEAL WITH A ‘BAD’ CONDOMINIUM TENANT - CONTACT THE OWNER

If a condominium owner regularly plays loud music, rolls golf balls across an uncarpeted floor, otherwise disturbs other residents or violates association rules, the board’s response is clear: Notify the owner that he or she is violating the rules and fine him/her if the violations continue. But what if the annoying resident is a tenant, not an owner? 

The response isn’t quite as straightforward. The board has no direct relationship with the tenant, no authority to enforce the association’s rules against him, and certainly no authority to evict him, unless the governing documents specifically grant that authority, which most do not.  The board’s relationship is with the owner of the unit, who is the tenant’s landlord, so any actions the board takes should start there.

Read More

BEFORE YOU SUE CITY HALL

When a condominium board or an individual unit owner discovers a construction defect that should have been caught before the building was ever occupied, the instinct is understandable: Someone should have seen this coming, and the town's building inspector was standing right there with the plans and the authority to stop the project.

Clients often come to counsel already convinced that the town shares the blame, sometimes more of the blame than the contractor who actually built the defective condition, and they want to know why their attorney is not filing suit against the city or town as well. This is often the point where an attorney has to deliver news the client does not want to hear. In Massachusetts, a condominium board or unit owner generally cannot recover from a municipality for failing to catch a construction defect during permitting or inspection, no matter how obviously inadequate that inspection turns out to have been in hindsight.

Read More

MEEB SECURES SETTLEMENT FOR ASSOCIATION’S CONSTRUCTION DEFECT CLAIM

Marcus Errico Emmer & Brooks, P.C. is pleased to announce the recovery of nearly $600,000 on behalf of a small South Shore condominium association in a construction defect and water damage dispute against its developer. The association had long been burdened by serious construction defects and resulting water damage that the developer had failed to adequately address. Nearly three years ago, the association presented the developer with a pre-suit demand of $300,000 — a figure the developer declined to meaningfully engage with at the time. Unwilling to leave the association without recourse, litigation partner Seth Barnett filed suit to protect the association's interests and hold the developer accountable.

Read More